There has been a much heated debate in Texas recently over a bill that would allow students who have a concealed hand gun license to carry a firearm on campus. I recently read more on this bill and came across a article called, " Texas lawmakers' guns on campus bills still a bad idea". The article is out of Dallas Morning news and is written by a journalist named Jeff Wentworth who works for the newspaper. In his article Wentworth describes all the possible scenarios and examples for complete failure with students carrying concealed hand guns on school campuses. As how heated arguments between students can lead to a situation going to far as pulling out the pistol and shooting the other student. Jeff also considers the circumstances such as accidental shootings that can occur from a handgun being set off.
Concealed hand guns would not only be allowed in the classrooms but students will be allowed to carry them around the whole campus and in there dorms. Wentworth also argues with amount of alcohol present with college students would be a recipe for violence and killings. Wentworth makes very good arguments that i cant even disagree with but with all that put aside i am a fan for guns on school campuses. In the state of Texas before you can carry a fire arm legally you must first get a concealed hand gun license through the state. You must complete a course that is based with knowledge and safety regulation with owning and firing a hand gun. After you pass the written course you must demonstrate firing the gun with confidence and accuracy before an instructor. You can complete the course within a day and only costs around 300 dollars for the course and actual license itself. Having that said no ordinary Joe would be allowed to carry a gun on campus only permitted students with a concealed hand gun license. It would make me feel safer and I am sure other students will feel safer knowing they can protect themselves and even prevent a catastrophe such as the Virginia school massacre.
Me personally as a Texan I have been around guns my whole life so I don't feel violated if another stranger has a permit to have a fire arm on them. Jeff Wentworth has very good credibility that he is a journalist for the Dallas Morning News but I do not agree with him on his agreements. Yes Wentworth has very good arguments against concealed hand gun licenses but the world and students would be safer having their own protection. Wentworth is trying to reach out his arguments to the community who do not support gun control laws in Texas but the truth is half of the legislation is for passing the bill. I hope the legislation passes the bill it would be for the benefit for us students and for citizens letting us know once more its our right to bear arms as citizens.
Here is the article i got my opinions on and more you can read off of http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20110225-editorial-texas-lawmakers-guns-on-campus-bills-still-a-bad-idea.ece
About Me
- JasonG
- Austin, Texas
- Well my name is Jason i am from a small town in south Texas called Kingsville. I currently have been living in Austin for the last couple of years now. I am a student at Austin Community College where i am pursing a career inEngineering. I plan to hopefully one day get accepted into the engineer program at the University of Texas. I enjoy just driving my truck around listening to some good music.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Friday, February 25, 2011
Trouble With Public Pensions?
I have recently read a column published by Ruben Navarrette Jr, who is a reporter at cnn.com. The title to his column is called The trouble with public pensions? Ask San Diego, is about public pension being cutting of to the state and making the pension money come out of the state to pay their retirees. It would be a huge cut to the city of San Diego, where he reported a 3.6 billion budget shortfall. He explained that the city had been shortchanging its public pension fund to the tune of more than $1 billion. The city of San Diego does not have the money to pay out what it already owes to the current retirees, let alone the multitudes of the future city retirees waiting for their turn. The public blames public employee unions for the collective bargaining powers they have and the corruptive scandals of political powers in the state. For instance in the case of the retired city head librarian who makes more than 200,000 a year who received a lavishing pension plan. The city officials knew of the budget shortfall and the gold plated pension plans but kept quiet to the public. Know more than thousands of retirees are sitting with no pension plans and its looking like theres going to be no hope for future retirees. Ruben is doing a good job of reaching out to the public letting the city of San Diego know of there corrupt political figures and their short budget pension plans. By reaching out to the audience of San Diego they are more well aware of there current situation and can act on it. Once the word got out of the pension problem city officials who were linked to these deals or knew about it have run from office and were replaced by reformers. Navarrette Jr, has good credibility being he is a reporter for cnn and presenting strong evidence through out his column. He shows good evidence of the scandal with the pension plans by presenting column pieces from the San Diego Union Tribune helping him win over his audience of the city. Having read this story it makes you think really hard about us as working class citizens knowing if our public pensions are being handled properly by our state. Going through life working hard knowing one day when we retire after being with a company for a long time, we will have a pension plan will let us sleep better at night.
You can read this column at http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/02/24/navarrette.pensions.wisconsin/index.html .
You can read this column at http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/02/24/navarrette.pensions.wisconsin/index.html .
Friday, February 11, 2011
Balancing Our Nation's Budget
I have read an article entitled Balance the Budget Now by Jim DeMint, it caught my attention and decided to write a blog about what he had to say. Our nations debt has reached it's highest point ever recorded by the government at an astounding 14 trillion dollars. Our current president Obama has raised the current debt ceiling again for the four time since he has been president. The government has been borrowing substantial money for the last couple of years in order to keep up with there huge spending spree. Increasing our nations debt is going to raise our taxes in order to keep up with the surplus of our governments spending. The republicans and democrats have not yet come up with a solution to cut back the spending. The year 1990 our national debt was at 3 trillion dollars, here in 2011 the debt has risen to 11 trillion dollars. That as an amazing 450% increase in our nations debt, its on track for 26 trillion in the next 10 years. With all this government spending a small percentage of the money is trickling down into our economy. Big industries are benefiting from the large government spending but the small business don't see any of the profit. Hopefully the government will look closer into the situation they are putting us American citizen in. We are feeling the full effects of our weak economy today, our future generations are the ones who will suffer from our massive nations debt. Changes in our government spending need to be addressed in order to help our current economic status. The senator from South Carolina made very good points, i would recommend this article to anyone.
Balance the budget now
Balance the budget now
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Is our voting age to young?
There has been many speculations to the rumor that young Americans want the voting age to be dropped down to the age of 16. At the age of 16 most student in high school have not even completed all the required history courses to graduate. I believe at the age of 16 you are simply to immature to understand the concept of the government and all the politics that goes into it. The average age for American voters these days is 44. Simply lowering the age down to 16 wouldn't help lower the average age of voters. It would help though with raising the expectations society has for younger Americans. The young would have much at stake and it is morally reprehensible for the older voters to elect officials willing to pile debt on the young to benefit the old. Either way the voting age goes it has its pros and cons to lowering the voting age.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)